
This weekend I saw a concert at Carnegie Hall. I’m not much for classical music; the emotional quality seems to escape me. What’s the purpose of art if not to inspire feelings? Brahms is so dreadfully heavy it gives me emotional amnesia. Mozart seems mathematical, mechanical even. Beethoven is all hot and bothered about something that alludes me altogether. And Tchaikovsky never spoke to me before, but somehow this Saturday’s performance was different. The featured artist of the evening was a 16-year-old violin virtuoso who, in addition to gaining international acclaim for his musical skills, has raised over 1.4 million dollars to support MS research; and he, himself, works in a lab at Stonybrook College helping to find a cure for this neurological disease… Yeah, aside from feeling horribly inadequate and under-accomplished in the presence of this young man, everything about his performance was attractive. How on earth did he hold my attention to something for which I have no affection? The sheer novelty and shock of his resume accounted for maybe ten minutes, but his performance lasted close to ninety, and every one was riveting.
I once dated a woman who came to life at her laptop. Of course, she was beautiful, smart, eccentric, etc. outside the confines of her writing routine; but she was at her most attractive when she got to work. Her brows would furrow, eyes would squint through her adorable glasses, and all of her attention focused forward. It was magic to watch her write. She would reach for things around her without glancing away from her screen. She could open a soda-bottle and drink from it without missing one beat while proofreading. She could light a cigarette and smoke the whole thing without losing her train of thought. The rhythm of her hands on the keys, the intensity of her stare, everything about her was engaging. It was as though the pressure of her deadlines brought all of her beauty right to the surface. It was captivating to watch.
Focus & discipline are sexy. Confidence, commitment, and uncompromising integrity are undeniably attractive. PASSION, PASSION is what draws people in; those who are passionate—be it about physics, comics, chapstick or slapstick—are attractive. Passion is passion. If someone can get concentrated & controlled, excited and ecstatic all at once, they can take anyone’s interest. It’s that combination of enthusiasm and direction that pulls attention like the current of a massive, moving body of water. It’s immutably entrancing.
Maybe I’m impatient, maybe I’m weird—maybe I’m even a little bit emotionally masochistic, but guarded people bore me. Give me raw. Give me exposed. Give me naked intensity, every day. I want someone who listens intently. I want someone who treats a conversation like a tennis match, like a tight-rope walk, something to be done with great care and attention. But of course that’s not all. This person should touch me like I’m a book that she wrote, like she owns the rights. When someone listens to our words, we feel respected. When that same person listens to our bodies, we feel real. There’s something about a physical connection with another person that gives a sense of location—like a confirmation that we are sentient, corporal beings with discernable, definite positions in space.
There have been weeks in my life where I have gone without a hug. There have been months without a kiss in them. And certainly, there have been years without sex. It’s at these times that I feel myself floating adrift in space, alone in the world—or at least inside my own head—and it’s not until I feel the pull of someone else’s grasp, of that attraction to another human being, that I begin to get my bearings once again. If I am not fortunate enough to be scooped up, to be reined in by another person, my only other cure for this nomadic, transient state of mind is: work. If I can ground myself in work, devote myself to some craft, give in to some project or endeavor, I can remain on earth. My passion for said project can then either be witnessed by others—thus making me appear attractive (and hopefully finding the cure twofold); or, I can transfer the enthusiasm for this project to any object affecting my attention. But the key is to do so somehow by accident, or at least by happenstance.
When there is a sense of self-awareness, when there is a self-conscious element to any performance, to any exhibition of behavior, the attractive quality is dead. Any sort of indicated passion, any performance of integrity, is repulsive. We sense the falsity, we are repelled by the insult to our instincts. Instead of feeling the tide pull us into its flow, we see still waters moved merely by a lazy breeze, and we are unconvinced to dive in—after all, if we are at the mercy of the wind, we don’t know which direction our vessels will take.
This boy held my attention because he was focused, his direction was clear, and he played the music with enthusiasm, with passion. It was his pure, raw spirit that drew me in, turns out passion can make anything exciting...even Tchaikovsky.
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Attracted to Tchaikovsky?
at
9:06 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


5 comments:
Anne Neczypor ... you are one smart lesbian.
That child's performance WAS mesmerizing. Your account of it equally so!
Hmm. I majored in music and have been in orchestras and string quartets nearly all my life, but I'll almost always prefer a good indie rock or singer/songwriter album over a Mozart recording. This may be because I'm a sucker for good lyrics, but I do think your gut assessments of Brahms, Mozart, Beethoven, and Tchaikovsky are apt. (Sacrilege! My friends will have me hanged!) There has to be something about the /performance/ that moves... The sort of unbridled sincerity that stems from a total eclipse of the self...
I didn't realize how mesmerizing Brahms could be until I watched Simon Rattle conduct the Philadelphia Orchestra two years ago. He's this tall, slender, waif of a man with impossibly long arms and the most ridiculous head of unruly white curls. He didn't even conduct; he just twirled his fingers and swayed about, wraith-like, with this magnificent smile on his face, and the orchestra sprang to life in a way I'd never seen before. It was as if every single member were hearing music for the first time and falling head-over-heels in love with the sound. All these hardened musicians who I was used to seeing in the worst sorts of moods, scowling or complaining bitterly over salary cuts and carpal tunnel, were suddenly, unavoidably, exposed on stage, emotionally naked, given over entirely to a symphony I hadn't expected to enjoy. I couldn't look away.
It's so easy, I think, to become invested in a pure effort to communicate. Listening to classical music can sometimes feel too much like being told something second-hand; the immediacy of composer and composition has to be translated before it can be understood. Too often, classical musicians get so caught up in producing accurate representations of what they see on the page that their consciousness of themselves as performers overrides their ability to cut loose and and just /play/.
Anyhow... Sorry to ramble. I really love where you took this post.
I recieved the most eloquent email regarding this post, I can't not share it with you all, so here it is:
"About Tchaikovsky... Did you know he was gay? I'm studying his compositions and also reading his biography. Apparently he wrote to his brother (also gay!) that he would marry a woman just to make his family and everyone "shut up", but 2 months in he had a nervous breakdown and they separated. During this time he had a spurt of musical creativity... it's fascinating to know that, stress ignites imagination. It makes perfect sense if you think about it... when we feel pressure, stress, and emotions run high, our mentality and our being morph into this intense, passionate, semi-mad state. So yeah, what arises from this state of intensity is truly creative, since being in this state induces us to focus a lot more than being in a relaxed state. Hope that made sense. So in response to your last comment there, "passion can make anything exciting-even Tchaikovsky", this implies to me that you think the Tchaikovsky piece wasn't in essence passionate and thrilling, but that the violinist boy made it that way. I'm not sure if you meant it like that, but... let me comment that it was simply the boy's amazing skill that allowed him to emulate the deeply passionate soul within the music itself, and all those composers..Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Tchaikovsky etc., had this intense love incorporated through all their works. Truly inspiring!"
Thanks friend!
Related to that email you got: While stress can indeed ignite creativity (as I'm sure we've all experienced), depression can stifle and suppress creativity. Someone recently told me that depression can actually affect your dreams - make them less vivid, less intense, and less frequent.
Sorry, that has nothing to do with the post - I just think it's such a hard line to walk (suddenly I'm hearing Johnny Cash) between productive stress and destructive stress. For example, you wrote about the lack of physical intimacy inspiring more focus and drive in you. I, on the other hand, find that a prolonged period of physical isolation makes me entirely apathetic. Maybe it has something to do with the amount, though. Like the way a little aspirin will cure a headache, but a lot will, you know, KILL YOU.
Post a Comment